Is Poor Things a feminist movie?

Poor Things, the latest film from acclaimed director Yorgos Lanthimos, has been celebrated as a modern feminist masterpiece.

Starring Emma Stone as Bella, a resurrected woman implanted with the developing brain of her unborn daughter by mad scientist Dr. Godwin Baxter, the movie delves into several key cornerstones of feminist theory. Here are some reasons why Poor Things is considered a feminist film:

1. Bella’s Sexual Liberation: Throughout the film, Bella experiences a period of sexual liberation. She innocently experiments with her body, expressing her sexual desires and needs without limitations or shame. These scenes highlight women’s agency and choice in their sexual activities, directly challenging societal norms.

2. Subverting the “Male Gaze”: While there is female nudity in the film (particularly thanks to Emma Stone’s courageous efforts), it also includes graphic male nudity. This departure from the typical objectification of women in cinema subverts the traditional “male gaze.” By showing both male and female nudity, Poor Things disrupts gendered expectations and provides a more balanced perspective.

3. Archetypes of Patriarchal Men: Although the film primarily centers on Bella’s experience, it also portrays several archetypes of inevitably patriarchal men. From thoughtful Max to brilliant “God,” relentless Duncan, and terrifying Alfie, these characters represent different manifestations of patriarchy and confinement faced by women in society.

However, it’s essential to note that while Poor Things has feminist elements, it is not a perfect feminist film. Written and directed by men, some sexual scenes lean closer to the male gaze than a female discovery of sexuality. Despite this, the movie remains a fascinating exploration of agency, liberation, and societal expectations.

In summary, Poor Things challenges patriarchal norms through Bella’s journey, showcasing her agency while providing thought-provoking commentary on gender dynamics and sexuality.